104.
ground for such a suggestion
if
the loust
had been
ignorance of what had previously
passed but in fact the court
fully
Arvare
丸心もん
of all the material
circumstances. The thief Instice
Knew
the doubts that had been
mi. Plumbel.
raised by mi.
he
Knew
the plan by which he had
proposed le me clunket to get
thave doubts set at rest and
he
Says
that be had
brew
told
that
Mr. Gillons to adapt M. Plunket
purpose so can not but have known
petition for
that
The
well
155
350
well as
Ins. Gibbous homself how
the
matter stood.
I do not understand why
Gulbene
tvas
raising
not justified
in
the question and challenging
a decision in
dis
way for
A
practical purpose connected with the arrivinistration of this bankruptly
Plunkets
why the taking up of Mr. Montale
petition which
Avas
independent
proceeding affecting other bankruptie, should have been
made a conditione
precedent to the right to proceed
with bankruptey.
185.
The 5th
ground which is
a-d
1
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.